Determinants of the Actual Use of E-Learning Systems: An Empirical Study on Zarqa University in Jordan
Keywords:E-learning, Actual Use of E-Learning Systems, Jordan
The study aimed to measure the impact of several antecedent factors (ease of use toward e-learning, usefulness toward e-learning, training on e-learning, and trust of e-learning) and intermediate factors (attitude to use e-learning and the intention to use e-learning) on the Jordanian Zarqa University students’ actual use of e-learning systems. Measurement tool was developed to examine the relationship between the study variables. The sample of (340) was selected from Zarqa University students. Results indicated that ease of use toward e-learning, usefulness toward e-learning, training on e-learning, and trust of e-learning impacted attitude to use e-learning. Also, ease of use toward e-learning, training on e-learning, and trust of e-learning did not impact the actual use of e-learning, while usefulness toward e-learning did. The study found that attitude to use e-learning mediate the relationship between the four antecedents and the students’ actual use of e-learning systems; whereas the intention to use e-learning mediated the relationship between (ease of use toward e-learning, usefulness toward e-learning, training on e-learning) and the students’ actual use of e-learning systems, while trust of e-learning did not.
Allehaibi, M. (2001). Faculty adoption of Internet technology in Saudi Arabian universities. PhD, Florida State University. Available: http://www.sssgrp.com/Menu/DissAbstracts/InnovationDiffusion/Allehaibi.htm. Retrieved on 12/4/2015.
Allen, I., and Seaman, J. (2004). Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004. Retrieved April 15, 2015 from: http://sloan-c.org/resources/entering_mainstream.pdf.
Baumgartner, T., Strong, C., and Hensley, L. (2002). Conducting & reading research in health & human performance. 3th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
Clark, Jr. T.D., Jones, M.C., and Zmud, R.W. (2006). Post adoptive ERP system analysis: A system dynamic modeling approach, Working Paper,
Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A., and Huff, S.L. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., and Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Diana, O. (1992). Teaching and learning with computers. (URL: http://orders.edrs.com).
Doll, W.J., Deng, X., and Scazzero, J.A. (2003). A process for post-implementation IT benchmarking. Information & Management, 41, 199-212.
George, P. (2000). Breaking ranks. Principal Leadership, 1(4), 56-61.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., and Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Imel, S. (1998). Myths and realities. (Report No. BBB16032). Columbus, OH. ERICClearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.
Jarvenpaa, S., Tractinsky, N., and Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1) 45-71.
Koohang, A. (2004). A study of users’ perceptions toward e- learning courseware usability. International Journal on E- Learning, 3(2), 10- 17.
Kulik, J. A., and Kulik, C. L. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 7(1), 75-94.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.
Masa’deh, R., Shannak, R., and Maqableh, M. (2013). A structural equation modeling approach for determining antecedents and outcomes of students’ attitude toward mobile commerce adoption. Life Science Journal, 10(4), 2321-2333.
Masa'deh, R., Tarhini, A., Bany Mohammed, A., and Maqableh, M. (2016). Modeling factors affecting student’s usage behaviour of e-learning systems in Lebanon. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(2), 299-312.
Mickelson, R., and Stephen S. (1999). Race, tracking, and achievement among African-Americans in a desegregated school system: Evidence from the Charlotte- Mecklenburg schools. Paper prepared for the Stanford University Conference on Race African Americans: Research and Policy Perspectives at the Turn of the Century.
Newkirk, H., and Lederer, A. (2006). The effectiveness of strategic information systems planning under environmental uncertainty. Information & Management, 43, 481-501.
Paris, P. (2004). E- Learning: A study on secondary students’ attitudes towards online web assisted learning. International Education Journal, 5(1), 98-112.
Park, J. (2005). The relationship between computer attitudes, usability and transfer of training in e-learning settings. PHD.University of Illinois, Available at Http: // www.lib.umi.com/dessertation/ preview- all/ 3182345. (Retrieved on January 2016).
Porter,C and Donthu,N. (2006) . Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research, 59, 999-1007.
Russell, A. I. (1995). Stages in learning new technology: Naïve adult e-mail users. Computers in Education, 25(4), 173-178.
Schumacker, R. E., and Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Stoehl, L., and Lee, K. (2003). Modeling the effect of experience on student acceptance of Web-based courseware. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 13(5), 364-374.
Swan, M.B. (2005). Improving learning in mathematics: Resources for teaching, multimedia resource. Professional Development Guide.
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., and Liu, X. (2013). Factors affecting students’ acceptance of e-learning environments in developing countries: A structural equation modelling approach. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(1), 54-59.
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., and Liu, X. (2014). Measuring the moderating effect of gender and age on e-learning acceptance in England: A structural equation modeling approach for an extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(2), 163-184.
Theriot, P. (2004). Student values and ethics in an e-learning environment. In D. Christopher & S. Jaderstrom (Eds.), NBEA 2004 Yearbook, 42, 13-25.
Tirri, K., and Nevgi, A. (2000). Students’ views on learning in virtual university. Finland. ERIC_NO: ED448121
Upton, D. (2005). Online learning in nutrition dietetics: Student performance and attitudes. The Journal of Health Sciences and Practice, 3 (1), 56- 65.
Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education: An introduction (7nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Willis, T (2008). An evaluation of the Technology Acceptance Model as a means of understanding online social networking behaviour, Master thesis, University of South Florida.
Zamfiroiu, A., and Sbora, C. (2014). Statistical analysis of the behavior for mobile E-learning. Procedia Economics and Finance, 10, 237-243.