Evaluation of Teacher Professionalism Development Policy through Teachers Working Group program: Policy Assessment Study on Teacher Working Group of Cluster 1 and Cluster 4 in Blimbing, Malang, East Java, Indonesia

Authors

  • Harun Al Rashid State University of Malang, Jalan Semarang, East Java, Indonesia
  • Supriyono Supriyono State University of Malang, Jalan Semarang, East Java, Indonesia
  • Djauzi Moedzakir State University of Malang, Jalan Semarang, East Java, Indonesia
  • Muhadjir Efendi State University of Malang, Jalan Semarang, East Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25255/jss.2017.6.2.300.318

Keywords:

Policy Evaluation, Teacher Professional Development, Teachers Working Group

Abstract

This study aimed at describing the effectiveness of: (1) the context of Teachers Working Group  program viewed from the relevance between the goals and objectives of  its program to the needs and problems of increasing the teachers’ professionalism; (2) input (feed-back) of Teachers Working Group program from the conformity of participating teachers characteristics, work programs, and its organizational capabilities in achieving program objectives  based on the development standards; (3) the process of Teachers Working Group  program implementation from the compatibility of tutor performance, member activity, infra-structure utilization, and its performance management  based on the development standard; and (4) the effectiveness of Teachers Working Group program for improving the participating  teachers’ professionalism and their attitudes toward the program. This is an evaluational research by which the model included evaluation of Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP)  developed by Stuffle beam. The study was conducted in Cluster 1 and Cluster 4 of the Teachers Working Group in Blimbing, Malang, East Java, Indonesia, in January-April 2016. The informants were members of the board and some participating teachers, and coaches in both clusters. Data were collected by observation, interview, and documentation. The data were analyzed by using Yin model consisting of five stages, namely compiling, disassembling, reassembling, interpreting, and concluding. The findings indicated that (1) the relevance between the goals and objectives of the program to the needs and problems of teachers’ professionalism improvement and the Teachers Working Group context in both groups were sufficiently effective to achieve the program objectives. The component of cluster 1 context was more effective than that of cluster 4.  The objectives, the needs of teachers, and work programs of group 1 were more relevant than those of group 4; (2) In terms of  the teachers’ interest to program and teachers’ needs of learning management, training programs, and capabilities of tutors and administrators in both groups,  the input component of cluster 1 was quite effective, while cluster 4 was less effective; (3) In terms of compatibility of tutor performance, member activity, infrastructure utilization, and the group management performance, the program implementation in both groups were equally effective; and (4) In terms of the benefits of the  program for the improvement of teacher is professionalism and teacher is positive attitude towards the program in both groups, the implementation of  the  program in both groups was classified quite effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, 2004. Professional Development for SD Teachers Through School Cluster, Teachers in Indonesia. Their Education, Training and Struggle Ince Colonial Era untuk Reformation Era. Directorate General of Primary and Secondary Education. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education of The Republic of Indonesia.

Agung, Iskandar and Yufridawati. 2013. Pembangunan Pola Kerja Harmonisdan Sinergis antara Guru, Kepala Sekolah, dan Pengawas. Bestari Buana Murni: Jakarta.

Amiruddin.TT.”Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru Sekolah Dasar Daerah Terpencil melalui Dana Blockgrant di Provinsi Nanggro Aceh Darussalam”. Tidak
Diterbitkan.

Anderson, Scarvia B., Ball, Samuel, dan Murphy, Richard T. 2000. Encyclopedia of Educational Evaluation. California: Jossey-Bass, Inc., Publisher.

Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Jabar, Cepi S. 2004. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan, Pedoman Teoretis Praktis bagi Praktisi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2004.

Bloom, Benjamin S., Hastings, Thomas, dan Madaus, George F. 1971. Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning, New York: McGrawhill Book Company.

Boulmetis, John dan Dutwin, Phyllis. 2005. The ABCs Of Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.

Brameld, T. 1966. Philosophy of Education in Cultural Perspective. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

Bronte-Tinkew, J., Horowitz, A., Redd, Z., dan Valladares, S. 2007. A Glossary of Research Terms for Out-of-School Time Program Practitioners, Research-to-Resulth. Washington D.C.: Child Trends.

Cangelosi, James C. 1991. Evaluating Classroom Instruction. New York: Longman Publishing Group.

Creswell, John W. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative & quantitativee approach. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.

Cohen, J. & Weimann, G. 2000, "Cultivation Revisited: Some Genres Have Some Effects on Some Viewers". Communication Reports, 13 (2).

Combs, H.P. and Manzoor, A. 1975. Educational For Rural Deveolpment: Case Study For Planners. New York: Praegar Publishers.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2007. Pedoman Evaluasi Dampak Pendidikan Nonformal. Jakarta: Ditjen PMPTK, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Dirjen PMPTK. 2010. Pedoman Pengelolaan Pengembangan Keprofesionalan Berkelanjutan (PKB). Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Djaali and Muljono, Pudji. 2004. Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan, Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Dunn, William, N. 2003, Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: PT. Hanindita Graya Widya.

Dunn, William, N. 2007. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, 4th edition, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Edward III, George C., 1980, Implementing Public Policy. Washington DC.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Faisal, S. 2002. “Profesi dan Bidang Studi Pendidikan Luar Sekolah (PLS).” Tesis Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang (UM): Malang. Tidak Diterbitkan.

Fakhruddin. 2010. “Revitalisasi Kelompok Kerja Guru Dalam Mengembangkan Kurikulum Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar Di Kota Semarang”. Laporan Penelitian (tidak diterbitkan). Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Fitzpatrick, Jody L., Sanders, James R. dan Worthen, Blaine R. 2004. Program Evaluation, Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidlines. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Flagg, Barbara N. 1990. Formative Evaluation for Educational Technologies. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.

Gomby, D.S. dan Larson, C.S. 1992. “Evaluation of School-linked Services,” dalam The Future of Children: School Linked Services ed. R. Behrmann. California: Center for the Future of children and David and Lucile Packard Foundation.

Gronlund, Normand E. 1985. Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching, New York: McMillan Publishing Company.

Indrawati. 2013. Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru dan Upaya Pengembangannya Melaui CPD/PKB. Bandung: Forum Kreativitas dan Karya Inovasi PTK IPA

Isaac, Stephen dan Michael, William B. 1981, Handbook in Research and Evaluation, For Education and the Behavioral Science. California: Edits Publishers.

Jalal, Fasli dan Supriadi, D. (Ed). 2001. Reformasi pendidikan dalam Konteks Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Adicita Karya Nusa.

Jalal, Fasli. 2007. Hand-out Rembug Nasional. Ditjen PMPTK, Depdiknas.

Jarvis, Peter, 1983, Adult and Conditionong Education: Theory and Practice. Croom Helm, Ltd.

Kaufman, Roger dan Thomas, Susan. 1980. Evaluation Without Fear, New York: New Viepoint.

Koster, Wayan. 2006. Memperjuangkan Nasib Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: tanpa penerbit.

Mathis, R.L. dan Jackson, John H. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Alih Bahasa Thomson. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Mawardi, Fanny. 2006. “Efektivitas Program Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Pegawai Pemerintah DKI Jakarta dalam Rangka Pengembangan Sumberdaya Manusia.” Disertasi. Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Nasution, S. (1988). Metode Peneltian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito

Nevo, David. 1986. “Evaluation: What Is It?” dalam Program Evaluation; A Practitioner’s Guide for Trainers and Educatiors, ed. Brinkerhoff. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Niachooff, R.O. 1977. Non Formal Education and Rural Poor. East Lansing: M.S.U Institute For International Studies

Owen, John M. 1993. Program Evaluation, Form and Approaches. New South Wales: Allen and Unwin Pty. Ltd.

Patton, Michael Q. 2008. Utilization-focused Evaluation, California: Sage Publication.

Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor PER/04/M.PAN/4/ 2007 tentang Pedoman Umum Formulasi, Implementasi, Evaluasi Kinerja, dan Revisi Kebijakan Publik di Lingkungan Lembaga Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 tahun 2006 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 73 Tahun 1991 tentang Pendidikan Luar Sekolah.

Popham, William J. 1975. Educational Evaluation. New Jersy: Prentice-Hall. Inc.

Posavac, Emil J. dan Carey, Raymond G. 1983. Program Evaluation, Methods and Case Studies (New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Preskill, Hallie dan Rust-Eft, Darlene, 2005. Building Evaluation Capacity, 72 Activities for Teaching and Training, California: Sage Publication.

Purnanda, Aan. 2013. “Pelaksanaan Fungsi Kelompok Kerja Guru (KKG) di Sekolah Dasar Negeri (SDN) Kecamatan Sungai Tarab Kabupaten Tanah Datar.” Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Volume 1 Nomor 1 Oktober 2013.

Purwanto and Suparman. 1999. Evaluasi program DIKLAT. Jakarta: STIA-LAN Press.

Roger, Glyn dan Badham, Linda. 1992. Evaluation in Schools, Getting Started on Training and Implementation. London: Routledge.

Rohmad, Z. 1994. Eksisitensi Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Surabaya: IKIP Surabaya.

Rossi, Petter, Lipsey, Mark W., dan Freeman, Howard W. 2007. Evaluation, A Systematic Approach. London: Sage Publication.

Sanusi, Ahmad, dkk. 1991. Studi Pengembangan Model Kependidikan Profesional Tenaga Kependidikan. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Bandung: Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

Somantri, Manap & Ridwan, Sa’adah. 2011. “Revitalisasi Kelompok Kerja Guru Guna Meningkatkan Kompetensi Dan Profesionalisme Guru Sd/Mi Di Kabupaten Seluma”. Jurnal Kependidikan Triadik, April, Volume 14, No.1

Standar Pengembangan Kelompok Kerja Guru (KKG) dan Musyawarah Guru Mata Pelajaran (MGMP), 2008, Jakarta, Direktorat Profesi Pendidik, Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Stufflebeam, Daniel and Shinkfield, Anthony J. 1986. Systematic Evaluation, A Self-Instructional Guide to Theory and Practice. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Sudjana, Djudju. 1993. Strategi Pembelajaran dalam Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Bandung: Nusantara Press.

______, 2006. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Bandung: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia dan Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tayibnapis, Farida Y. 2000. Evaluasi Program. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-01

How to Cite

Al Rashid, H., Supriyono, S., Moedzakir, D., & Efendi, M. (2017). Evaluation of Teacher Professionalism Development Policy through Teachers Working Group program: Policy Assessment Study on Teacher Working Group of Cluster 1 and Cluster 4 in Blimbing, Malang, East Java, Indonesia. Journal of Social Sciences (COES&Amp;RJ-JSS), 6(2), 300–318. https://doi.org/10.25255/jss.2017.6.2.300.318

Issue

Section

Articles