Pragmatic Approach: Lexical Presupposition in King Abdullah II Political Speech
Keywords:Pragmatics, Presupposition, Political Speech, Lexical Presupposition
The purpose of this study is to cast the light on the lexical presupposition in political speech by King Abdullah II of Jordan. The lexical presupposition is one of the primary concepts of pragmatics, and it is used to include a general class of pragmatic and semantic phenomena that have a fundamental impact on the apprehension of utterances. Particularly, this concept denotes premise that truth is taken in an utterance and without the value of truth that cannot be set and can broadly be related with a lexical element or certain grammatical features in any utterance. The language plays a significant role in the communication and interpretation of intentions by examining selected political speeches of King Abdullah II in European Parliaments Strasbourg in 2015 and his speech at the Leaders' Summit on Refugees (on the margins of the 71st UN General Assembly) that held in New York in 2016. Generally, political speech involves a language that is padded to be understood only by political people or people who have knowledge in political speeches whose language tends to be ambiguous and implicit meaning. Thus, this study glosses the lexical presupposition in King Abdullah II political speech. It finds the lexical presupposition in his speech and the reason for using lexical presupposition in his speech.
Bajnaid, A., Veltri, G., and Elyas, T. 2018. Utilizing Matrimonial Web sites Among Saudi Users: An Empirical Study. Digest of Middle East studies, 1-30.
Banjar. S .2009. Presupposition and Entailment, Department of English Jeddah/ Saudi Arabia.
Beard Adrian, 2000. The Language of Politics, New York: Routledge.
Boase-Beier, J. 2014. Stylistics and Translation. In: M. Burke, ed. The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. London and New York: Routledge, pp.393-407.
Chilton P. 2004. Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice, London: Routledge.
Fasold, Ralph W., and Linton, Jeff Connor. 2006. An Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, S. 1984. Questions as a mode of control in a magistrate’s court. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 49, 5-27.
Hashim.S. 2009. Existential Presupposition in Religious Islamic Texts: Pragmatic Implications. University of Sulaimani/ Iraq.
Hazlett, A. 2010. Factive Presupposition and the Truth Condition on Knowledge, 78:3, pp.
Grundy, P. (2000). Doing Pragmatics, New York: Arnold.
Leech. J. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics, New York: Rutledge.
Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marmaridou, Sophia S. A. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Mazlum. F. 2016. Evaluative Language in Political Speeches: A Case Study of Iranian and American Presidents’ Speeches.
Searle J.R. 1969. Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simpson, P., and Mayr, A. 2010. Language and Power, London: Routledge.
Smith, N. V. (ed.) 1982. Mutual Knowledge. London: Academic Press.
Stalnaker, R. 1972. Pragmatics. In: Davidson, D. and G. Harman, eds. Semantic of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Thomas J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics, New York: Longman.
Thornborrow, Joanna and Wareing Shan. 1998. Interface Patterns in Language: An Introduction to Language and Literary Style. Oxford: BlackwellPress.
Van Dilk and Teun A. 1997. What is political discourse analysis?, in: J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Political Linguistics,
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University
Watson J. R. and Hill A. 1993. A Dictionary of Communication and Media Studies, London: Edward Arnold.
Youssef. S. 2015. A Pragmatic Analysis of Presupposition Use in Political Discourse: Obama's Speech on ISIL. Helwan University.
Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Zglobui. A. 2015. Elements of Pragmatics in Political Discourse. Studia Ubb Philologia, LX, 2.