L2 Learners’ Performance in Three Language Skills: Focus on Sex-Related Differences


  • Hosni Mostafa El-dali, Dr. United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, U.A.E.


Variability, L2 learners’ proficiency, sex


It is a generally accepted fact in L1 acquisition that females enjoy a rate advantage, initially at least. However, I know of no study that has systematically investigated the rate of second language acquisition (SLA) in females versus males. It might be safe to cite few SLA studies: Farhady, 1982; Eisenstein, 1982; Lakoff, 1973; Zimmerman and West, 1975; and Gass and Varonis, 1986. Although these studies reported sex-related differences, they were incidental to their main focus.

 The subjects for the present study are 180 students in the Department of English, Faculty of Arts, Minufiya University, Egypt. They are divided into three groups according to their academic status in their university: Beginners (60); Intermediate (60); and advanced (60). Each group is equally divided into males (30), and females (30). Accordingly, the total number of males is 90, and that of females is 90, as well. All subjects performed three tasks: 1) listening; 2) reading, and 3) structure and written expressions, similar, to those used in the TOEFL test. The overall umbrella, under which all these tasks are designed, is ‘systematicity’; and/or ‘variability’; and whether learners' sex is responsible for it. Results are obtained and conclusions are made. 


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hosni Mostafa El-dali, Dr., United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, U.A.E.

Associate Professor of Linguistics

United Arab Emirates University

P.O.Box: 15551, Al-Ain, U.A.E.


Anne Brooks-Lewis, K., 2009. Adult learners' perceptions of the incorporation of their L1 in foreign language teaching and learning. Language Learning, vol. 62.
Aslan, O. 2009. The role of gender and language learning strategies in learning English. Unpublished Mater’s Thesis.
Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S. and Ellis, R. 2004. Teachers' stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics 25: 243-272.
Beare, S. and Bourdages, J. 2007. Skilled writers' generating strategies in L1 and L2: An exploratory study. In G. Rijlaarsdam, M. Torrance, and L. Van Waes (eds.), Studies in -Writing, vol. 20, Amsterdam.
Brantmeier, C. 2003. Does gender make a difference? Passage content and comprehension in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 15 (1): 39-78.
Brantmeier, C. 2004. Gender, violence-oriented passage content and second language reading comprehension. The Reading Matrix 4 (2): 22-51.
Broadbent, D. 1971. Decision and Stress. London: Academic Press.
Brown, A. 2009. Students' and teachers' perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modem Language Journal 93: 46-60.
Brown, G. 1996. Language Learning, Competence and Performance. In Brown, G., Malmkjar, K. and Williams, J. (eds.), Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Cameron D. 1995. Verbal Hygiene. New York: Routledge.
Cohen, A. 2008. Strategy instruction for learners of Japanese: How do you do it and what's in it for them? In Japanese as a foreign language education: Multiple perspectives' (PP. 45-60). Tokyo: Kurosio Shuppan.
Conley, M. 2008. Cognitive strategy instruction for adolescents: What we know about the promise, what we don't about the potential. Harvard Education Review, 78 (1), 84-106.
De Bot, K.: Lowie, W. and Verspoor, M. 2007. A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1011: 7¬21.
DeKeyser, R. 2003. Implicit and explicit learning. In C.J. Doughty and M.H. Long (eds.). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 313-348). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. and Short, DJ. 2004. Making Content Comprehensible for English -Learners: The SIOP Model. Boston: Pearson.
Ehrlich, S. 1997. Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 421-446.
Ehrman, M.E. and Oxford, R.L. 1995. Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The Modern Language Journal 79: 67-89.
Eisenstein, M. 1982. A study of social variation in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning 32: 367-91.
El-Daly, H. 1993. Linguistic And Cognitive Analysis of foreign student's performance strategies in solving language problems: Emphasis on conceptual and procedural knowledge. Philology XXI: 145-241.
Ellis, N.C. 2005. At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 305-352.
Ellis, N.C., 2002. Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 297-339.
Ellis, R 1990. A Response to Gregg. Applied Linguistics 11(4): 389-392.
Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. 2006. Current issues m the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly 40: 83-107.
Eskildsen, S. 2008. Constructing another language - usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, Oxford University Press, 1-23.
Eslamim, Z. and Fatahi, A. 2008. Teachers' sense of self efficacy, English proficiency, and instructional strategies. A study of nonnative EFL teachers in Iran. TESL-EJ, 11 (4).
Farhady, H. 1982. Measures of Language Proficiency From the Learner's Perspective. TESOL Quarterly 16: 43-59.
Fodor, J., T. Bever, and M. Garrett. 1974. The Psychology of Language. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Freeman, D. and Long, M. 1991. An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. Longman, London and New York.
Gascoigne, C. 2002. The role of gender in L2 interaction. Socialization via L2 materials. Encuentro Revista de Investigacion e Innovacion en la Class de idi, 13/14: 81-89.
Gass, S. and Varonis, E. 1986. Sex Differences in NNS/NNS Interactions. In Day, R. (ed.), Talking to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition. Newbury House, Rowley, Mass.
Gelman, R. and Meek, E. 1986. The notion of principle: the case of counting. In Hiebert, J. (ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Han, Z.-H., 2005. Input enhancement: Untangling the tangles. Keynote presentation at the 27th Winter Applied Linguistics Conference, New York State Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, New York.
Hoey, M. 2007. Grammatical creativity: A corpus perspective. In Hoey, M., Mahlberg, M., Stubbs, M. and Teubert, W. (eds.). Text, Discourse and Corpora. London, Continuum.
Holmes, J. 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. New York: Longman.
James, W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. New York : Holt.
Jiang, N. 2007. Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning 57 (1): 1-33.
Kaushanskaya, M., Marian, V., Yoo, J. 2011. Gender differences in adult word learning. Acta Psychologica 137: 24-35.
Kimberly, A. 2009. Adult learners' perceptions of the incorporation of their Ll in foreign language teaching and learning. Oxford University Press.
Kissau, s. 2007. Gender differences in second language motivation: An investigation of micro- and macro-level influences. The Reading Matrix 7 (1): 31-58.
Klatzky, R. 1995. Human Memory: structures and processes. San Francisco: W. Freeman and Company.
Knutson, E., 2006. Thinking in English, writing in French. The French Review 80 (1): 88- 109.
Lakoff, R. 1973. Language and woman's place. Language in Society 2: 45-79.
Larsen Freeman, D. and Cameron, L. 2007. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, 2005. Five types of input and the various relationships between form and meaning. In J.F. Lee & A. Valdman (ads.), Form and Meaning: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 25-42). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Lightbown, P.M. and Spada, N. 2006. How Languages are Learned (3rd edition). Oxford.
Mangubhai, F. 2006: What do we know about learning and teaching second languages: Implications for teaching. Asian EEL Journal 8(3): 1-20.
McLaughlin, B. 1978. Theories of Second Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.
Miller, G. 1956. The magical number seven Plus or Minus two, and some limits on our capacity for processing information.. Psychological Review 63: 81-96.
Nunan, D. 1996. Issues in second language research: examining substance and procedure. In Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T. (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition: Academic Press.
Piasecka, L. 2010. Gender differences in L1 and L2 reading. In J. Arabski and A. Wojtaszek, Neurolinguistic and Psycholinguistic Perspectives on SLA (pp. 145-158). Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Poole, A. 2003. The kinds of forms learners attend to during focus on form instruction: A description of an advanced ESL writing class. The Reading Matrix (2).
Poole, A. 2005. Focus on form instruction: foundations, applications, and criticisms. The Reading Matrix 5 (1).
Reynolds, D. 2010. Assessing Writing, Assessing Learning. Ann Arbor., MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T. 1996. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Academic Press.
Rosenberg, R. 2009. Tools for activating materials and tasks in the English language classrooms. English Teaching Forum 47 (4): 2-11.
Schmidt, R.W. 2001. Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language
Instruction (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shakouri, N. and Saligheh, M. 2012. Revisiting age and gender influence in second language acquisition. Advances in English Linguistics (AEL) 1 (1): 1-6.
Sharwood-Smith, M. 2004. In two minds about grammar: On the interaction of linguistic and metalinguistic knowledge in performance. Transactions of the Philogical Society 102: 255-280.
Sheen, R., 2005. Focus on forms as a means of improving accurate oral production. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (eds.), Investigations in Language Acquisition (pp. 271-¬310). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Spada, N. and Lightbown, P. 2008. Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated. TESOL Quarterly 42 (2): 181-207.
Tarone, E. 1985. Variability in Interlanguage study of Style-shifting in Morphology and Syntax. Language Learning 35: 373-404.
Trenkic, D. 2007. Variability in second language article production: Beyond the representational deficit vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research 23 (3): 289-327.
Weijen, D., Berg, H. and Rijlaarsdam, G., Sanders, T. 2009. L1 use during L2 writing: An empirical study of a complex phenomenon. Journal of Second Language Writing 18: 235-250.
Zimmerman, D. and West, C. 1975. Sex roles, Interruptions, and Silence in Conversation. In Thorne, B. and Henley, W. (eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Newbury House, Rowley, Mass.




How to Cite

El-dali, H. M. (2013). L2 Learners’ Performance in Three Language Skills: Focus on Sex-Related Differences. Journal of Social Sciences (COES&Amp;RJ-JSS), 2(3), 114–138. Retrieved from https://centreofexcellence.net/index.php/JSS/article/view/jss.2013.