Employee engagement of mangarial staff in hospitals – an Indian pilot study
Employee engagement is a state of emotional and intellectual involvement that employees have in an organization. An engaged employee is aware of business context, and works with colleagues to improve performance within the job for the benefit of the organization. It is a positive attitude held by the employees towards the organization and its values.
This study focused on how employee engagement is an antecedent of job involvement and what should the management of hospitals do to make their managers engaged. This study conducted was to find out the levels of employee engagement, the drivers of it, which includes Employee Empowerment, Communication, Team Work, Training and Development, Recognition, Leadership Quality, and Work Life Balance to analyze their impact and to offer suggestions to improve the same. The study adopted non-probability sampling using systematic method to collect primary data. The samples of the study constituted 100 managerial staff from various hospitals in Nagapattinam District, Tamil Nadu, India. Anova, Chi square and Paired t-test were employed in the analysis of data.
The results of the study indicated that the Employee Engagement of Managerial Staff in Hospitals of Nagapattinam District is moderate and Recognition helps to attain Employee Engagement.. The hospitals should concentrate on dimensions like Recognition and Team work to improve Employee Engagement of the hospitals.
2. CIPD (2007), Employee Engagement,
3. Conference Board (2006), Employee Engagement: A review of current research and its
implications, The Conference Board
4. Dulye & Co (2006), 5 Ways to Keep New Hires Engaged, www.lmdulye.com
5. Gallup (2006), Gallup study: engaged employees inspire company innovation, The Gallup Management Journal, http://gmj.gallup.com/content/24880/Gallup‐Study‐Engaged‐Employees‐
6. Harter JK, Schmidt FL, Hayes TL (2002), Business‐unit‐level relationship between
employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279
7. Judge TA, Thoresen CJ, Bono JE, Patton G K (2001), The job satisfaction‐job
performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review, Psychological
Bulletin, 127, 376–407
8. Kahn WA (1990), Psychological conditions of personal engagement and
disengagement at work, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724
9. Kenexa (2008), Engaging The Employee: A Kenexa Research Institute World Trends
Report., Kenexa Research Institute
10. Laurainne Theogaraj, HRM Review, ICFAI University Press, Dec-07: Page No:40
11. May DR, Gilson RL, Harter LM (2004), The psychological conditions of
meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human
spirit at work, Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 77, 11–37
12. Ott B, Blacksmith N, Royal K (2007), Job seekers ask: who’s the boss?, The Gallup Management Journal, http://gmj.gallup.com/content/103114/Job‐Seekers‐Ask
13. Robinson D, Perryman S, Hayday S (2004), The Drivers of Employee Engagement,
Institute for Employment Studies Report 408
14. Robinson D, Hooker H, Hayday S (2007), Engagement: The Continuing Story,
Institute for Employment Studies Report 447
15. Robinson D, Perryman S , Heyday S The drivers of Employee Engagement, Report 408, Institute For Employment Studies, April 2004
16. Swaminathan J “Essential Components of Employee Engagement – A Study with reference to TNSTC, Kumbakonam”, in “Advances in Management”, Vol-3(12), December 2010, pp 55-59
17. Towers Perrin (2006), Ten Steps to Creating an Engaged Workforce: Key European
Findings, Towers Perrin HR Services
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.