Did Nongovernmental Monitoring improve Working Conditions in the case of Nike and the Footwear Industry?
This article examines working conditions in the RMG sector of Bangladesh could improve through effective monitoring system. In a significant case Nike suggested that working conditions and labour rights can be improved through a systematic approach and a comprehensive and transparent monitoring system. External pressure from NGOs and other advocacy groups motivated Nike to introduce a Code of Conduct and a monitoring system. The process is discussed in this section.
Bambi, T. (2008). Facts about Nike Sweatshops, http://www.ehow.com, viewed on 04/4/2010
Beach Emily (2010). Facts aboutNike Sweatshops, eHow Contributor, http://www.ehow.com/about_5485125_nike-sweatshops.htm
Bigg, T. (2002). Core Labour Standards and Human Rights in the Workplace, Published by International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) in collaboration with the Regional and International Networking Group (RING), WSSD Coordinator, IIED, 3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1H 0DD, http://www.eldis.org/id21ext/s7cjh1g1.html
Richard M. L, Fei Qin and Brause (2007). “Does Monitoring Improve Labour Standards? Lessons from Nike”, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, Volume 1, p. 61, October, 2007, http://web.mit.edu/polisci/research, viewed on 02/04/2010
Richard, P. and Cong Cao (2007). “CHINA: Science and Technology Power is Emerging”, Oxford Analytical Daily Brie, Oxford, UK: Oxford Analytica (April 19).
Turner, L. (1991). “Democracy at Work: Changing World Markets and the Future of Labour Unions”, pp. 128-135, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, http://books.google.com.au/books?
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.